Optional, But Enforced, Parameters

There’s bound to be a better term than optional, enforced parameters. My definition is that these are URL parameters that you don’t really care about except for SEO (search engine optimization) but if you have to have them, then they may as well be correct. They help make friendlier URLs.

If I want to get to a details page of an object, the ideal URL parameter is a single integer mapping to an id. It’s simple, clean, and fast. It’s the default URL mapping in WordPress. However, a single id tells a search engine nothing about the page. It’s a wasted opportunity and it’s important to take advantage of it.

Let’s get concrete. A good URL for a game details page may be http://www.atomicgamer.com/games/34/Diablo-III. It contains the game id (34) for quick lookups, but also contains the game name for SEO. I don’t care about the Diablo III portion when fetching the data, but I do want it to remain consistent for links.

I took a look into doing this with both Tapestry 5 and Wicket. I’m fair from an expert in either of them, so there could be a better way to do this. This is simply the way I determined to do it.

Tapestry 5

First, I need to put a link to my details page somewhere.


<t:grid source="games" row="game">
  <t:parameter name="nameCell">
    <a t:type="pagelink" t:page="games" context="list:game.id,game.name">${game.name}</a>
  </t:parameter>
</t:grid>

Pretty straightforward. That’ll create a link formatted as /games/{id}/{name}. Tapestry does all that for me, and in fact, if I didn’t care about enforcing the game name to be correct, I’d be done. (I’m using the list binding prefix for a quick shorthand here.)

All the rest of the work is done in the game details page’s onActivate method. This method will be called whenever a person goes to the page. I’ll need to fetch the game from the id, and then compare the name parameter to the game’s actual name.


Object onActivate(Long id, String name)
{
  game = gameDAO.findById(id);
  if (game == null)
  {
    return pagelinkSource.createPageRenderLink(Index.class);
  }

  if (!game.getName().equals(name))
  {
    return pagelinkSource.createPageRenderLinkWithContext(this.getClass(), id, game.getName());
  }

  return null;
}

The interesting part is the second if statement. If the names don’t match, I’m actually going to redirect the user to the page with the correct name. This costs a bit in terms of performance, but it will force it to stay consistent. If you’re ambitious, you could include a flash message here and tell the user to update their bookmarks.

That’s about it for Tapestry.

Wicket

The Wicket code is eerily similar in concept. First, I build up my bookmarkable link with the two parameters.


BookmarkablePageLink link = new BookmarkablePageLink("detailsLink", DetailsPage.class);
link.setParameter("id", game.getId());
link.setParameter("name", game.getName());
link.add(new Label("name", game.getName()));
item.add(link);

And somewhere down the line, I use that link.


<a wicket:id="detailsLink"><span wicket:id="name">Game Name</span></a>

Now, Wicket supports clean URLs out of the box, but you have to configure it first or you’re going to get some really ugly URLs. To make my life easier in the long run, I installed the wicketstuff-annotation library. With this, I can just add a couple annotations to the top of my details page to get clean URLs.


@MountPath(path = "games")
@MountMixedParam(parameterNames = {"id", "name"})
public class DetailsPage extends WebPage
{
...
}

With a nice clean URL in hand (/games/{id}/{name}), we’re just a redirect away from being finished. Like Tapestry, I’ll fetch the game and redirect.

public DetailsPage(PageParameters parameters)
{
  super(parameters);

  Game game = getGame(parameters.getAsLong("id"));
  if (!game.getName().equals(parameters.getString("name")))
  {
    parameters.put("name", game.getName());
    setResponsePage(this.getClass(), parameters);
    setRedirect(true);
    return;
}
...
}

And that’s it. I’ll disclaim again that I’m neither a Tapestry or Wicket guru, and I would love someone to point out a better way to do this.

For now though, it’s minor performance cost, but grants me lovely clean, friendly URLs with parameters I don’t have to worry about. If I change the name of Diablo III to Diablo 3, users with the old URL will be redirect to the new URL. I don’t have to think about it and that’s perfect for me.

Wicket – First Thoughts

I decided to take a break from my duel with Tapestry and look into Wicket. It’s similar to Tapestry in that it’s a Java component-based web framework and I was really tired of smashing my head into the wall with Tapestry, so I started playing around with it.

I’m only had a handful of hours into it, so take it all with a grain a salt. The same with my Tapestry thoughts as well.

The code is more concrete in Wicket. I can write regular Java code that uses interfaces and inheritance to let IntelliJ IDEA know that the code is actually being used somewhere. Compared this to Tapestry which leaves my IDE with a plethora of grayed methods and variables.

By convention is fine in the beginning of a project, but it can become a nightmare as you work to maintain that code and forget whether that “unused” method is really used or not. I’ll take a extending a class over magic methods any time.

However, as I’ve gotten older, I’ve become lazier. The second thing I noticed once I got a project running is how little Wicket provides out-of-the-box. IoC? Install your own. ORM? Find it yourself.  Wicket simply manages the “web” portion of being a web framework.

And that’s not necessarily a bad thing. It’s not shameful to do one thing well. But it does mean, I have to do more work at the beginning to make a useful web application. I spent last night getting Guice, warp-persist, and Hibernate to play nice. (There’s probably a useful blog post from that experience). Getting frameworks to work together is not the most productive thing I can do with my time.

I don’t mean to turn this into a Tapestry vs Wicket article, but I can’t help but compare them. Tapestry, out of the box so to speak, does offer IoC and Hibernate components. And Tapestry does a decent job without becoming a bloated, huge monster.

If I just went by Tapestry and Wicket, I would think open source fails at documentation. Luckily, Hibernate and Spring prove that good documentation is possible. I think both Wicket and Tapestry just need to reorganize most of what they already have written. To find the useful Wicket documentation, you have to scroll past the blurbs about how cool Wicket is to use, how you should have been using it yesterday already, and how you can get it now. Move past all that and you can get find some useful info scattered in the wiki.

As my spare time allows, I’ll continue to play around with both Tapestry and Wicket. I don’t want to rush into any decision and be stuck with it for the next few years. Right now, neither is jumping out and screaming “productivity” to me.

Tapestry Growing Pains

I really want to like Tapestry 5. How can a Java web developer not want to like something that basically describes itself as not-Struts? However, there have been some frustrations as I’ve prototyped AtomicGamer 2.0.

Documentation

Tapestry 5 actually has a good amount of documentation. The API documentation is commented. A tutorial is available. Several of the concepts have long and detailed pages of text.

I just can’t find anything.

There’s 5 separate pages on component functionality, but I can’t find out how to actually inject a component onto a page. I know I saw it somewhere, but it’s lost now. There’s InjectComponent and Component annotations, but I don’t know what the difference is between them and I’m sure the difference is significant.

I need more information about contexts, but it took forever to learn that they are a page rendering request feature and documented under page navigation. I apparently should have known this.

I think the problem is the layout of the documentation rather than the contents. I understand what I want to do, but I cannot map my concepts into Tapestry concepts. Hence, the documentation is painful to use at best.

By Convention

I was a Java and C++ developer, but I’m currently employed as a PHP web developer. Being the only “Java guy” at work, I get some flak thrown at me, but I like to toss some back. For example, PHP is dynamically-typed and interpreted. You never can really be sure if that method is used or if those parameters are the correct type. At least, not until run-time.

Thanks to the popularity of Ruby on Rails, “by convention” is the new big thing and Tapestry 5 loves it. My IntelliJ IDEA is filled with grayed method names since IDEA has no way to know if those methods or even classes are really in use. Is my onActivate method going to be called? Are those the correct parameter types? Who knows! Who cares! It’s by convention!

Annotations can help remove the gray, but then I’m just left with an IDE that thinks everything is used whether or not reality matches.

Prototype and AJAX

I’ve been on the fence with Tapestry 5 ever since I learned they embedded the Prototype Javascript library into it instead of being Javascript-framework neutral. I know jQuery already, do I really need to learn another Javascript library to use your Java web framework?

In theory, the standard components in Tapestry should hide Prototype and any Javascript library from me. For example, I want to display my BeanDisplay component. If a user clicks an edit button, it makes an AJAX call and loads a BeanEditForm component.

The Zone component may be able to do this, but I can’t get it to work how I want. Maybe because I’m haven’t found the right documentation. I’m left with implement the Javascript myself, but now I need to learn Prototype or learn how to safely embed jQuery and Prototype into my Tapestry 5 application.

I forget — what, exactly, is Tapestry suppose to be helping me accomplish?

I’ll admit, I’m a Tapestry newbie. However, I’m not a web newbie. I’m not a software engineer newbie. I’m sure Tapestry can be masterfully productive for some people, but I’m just not feeling it yet. Mostly, it feels like I’m fighting the framework and documentation to get it to do what I need it to do, and still failing.

Wicket? Stripes? Back to Struts 2? I don’t know.